EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Talk about general things related to the new VW Scirocco in here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kev
Administrator
Posts: 5074
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box
Options: Leather, cruise, parking sensors, folding mirrors, flat tyre indicator
Sadly replaced now by an F-Type.
Location: Oxford

EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by Kev »

If anyone's interested and (like me) is in the market for some new front rubber.

The Car: Audi A3 1.8 TFSI - 168 bhp
Tyre Size Tested: 225/45/17
The Track: Goodyear Mireval - South of France
Track Temp: ~26 C

Results:

1. Pirelli P Zero
2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Assym 2
3. Michelin PS3
4. Continental SC5
5. Bridgestone Potenza S001
6. Dunlop Sport Maxx RT
7. Hankook Ventus S1 EVO 2
8. Vredesrein Ultrac Vorti
9. Kumho Ecsta Le Sport
10. Nexen N8000
Cuprabob
Posts: 5036
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:31 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Panoramic Roof, 19" Black Luganos, Vienna Leather, Parking Sensors, DAB, Dynaudio, Bluetooth, Cruise, Folding Mirrors, Xenons
Location: S/W Scotland

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by Cuprabob »

That explains why the 235/35 by 19 P Zeros that I paid £151.60 at Camskill for a few weeks ago are now £219.40 :-)
voyager
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 12:58 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Salsa Red
With a: Manual box
Options: cruise control

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by voyager »

Interesting. Was the test based solely on performance or was there any comment on how long the tyres last, as according to a multitude of roc owners on this forum if you get 10k out of a set of P Zero fronts you're doing well which means that if I had P Zeros rather than Bridgestone Potenzas from which I get 20k, I'd be buying a set of fronts every 6 months and consequently spending a lot more so I'd have to ask whether their performance really that much better for the average owner?
Cuprabob
Posts: 5036
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:31 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Panoramic Roof, 19" Black Luganos, Vienna Leather, Parking Sensors, DAB, Dynaudio, Bluetooth, Cruise, Folding Mirrors, Xenons
Location: S/W Scotland

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by Cuprabob »

voyager wrote:Interesting. Was the test based solely on performance or was there any comment on how long the tyres last, as according to a multitude of roc owners on this forum if you get 10k out of a set of P Zero fronts you're doing well which means that if I had P Zeros rather than Bridgestone Potenzas from which I get 20k, I'd be buying a set of fronts every 6 months and consequently spending a lot more so I'd have to ask whether their performance really that much better for the average owner?
I'm still on my original front P Zeros after 31k miles. Still a few thousand left in them. That's the longest I've ever managed out of a set of front tyres. Normally I get around 20k miles. I'm currently doing around 2.5k miles a month, mainly motorway driving.
gibbsy
Posts: 247
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:42 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Indium Grey
With a: DSG box
Options: Very pretty Cocker Spaniel in the boot

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by gibbsy »

I managed just 12k on my P Zeros on the front, the rears on the other hand are like new. Now I've got the excellent Eagles on the front and I've reduced the recommended inflation to 33psi which does seem to helping with uneven wear. 8k on the Eagles and overall just under 6mm left. I prefer the Eagles they are much more sure footed in the wet and are very quiet on the motorway.

I had P Zeros on my Civic VTi and they only lasted 7k..................but worth it. I'm older now. :cry:
Cuprabob
Posts: 5036
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:31 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Panoramic Roof, 19" Black Luganos, Vienna Leather, Parking Sensors, DAB, Dynaudio, Bluetooth, Cruise, Folding Mirrors, Xenons
Location: S/W Scotland

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by Cuprabob »

I used F1 Eagle A1s and A2s on my R32 and they were brilliant.
User avatar
Kev
Administrator
Posts: 5074
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box
Options: Leather, cruise, parking sensors, folding mirrors, flat tyre indicator
Sadly replaced now by an F-Type.
Location: Oxford

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by Kev »

voyager wrote:Interesting. Was the test based solely on performance or was there any comment on how long the tyres last, as according to a multitude of roc owners on this forum if you get 10k out of a set of P Zero fronts you're doing well which means that if I had P Zeros rather than Bridgestone Potenzas from which I get 20k, I'd be buying a set of fronts every 6 months and consequently spending a lot more so I'd have to ask whether their performance really that much better for the average owner?
They test wet and dry handling, cornering braking, noise etc.

My conti sport 3's are just about shot after only 11k miles on the front. I might look at the Pirelli's this time.
davidscirocco
Posts: 392
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 7:47 am
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: panorama tilting roof, electric
"interlagos" alloy wheels
sport pack
RCD 510
air-contition Climatronic with dual- zone climate control, left and right side separately controllable

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by davidscirocco »

i have done 66K kilometers with my P ZERO. but i think its time to replace them :) really happy with the tires. but i cant afford buying the same tires. so im going for cheaper tires. any recommendations?
Image
User avatar
a4gee
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:38 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Options: Winter pack,Parking sensors,Dynaudio,Tyre indicator,Pano roof,GT steering wheel badge,VW Mats, rubber/premium,Headlight and led upgrade interior/exterior,Metal pedals inc foot rest,HK sills,R lights,Cup holder for rear,Concealed ashtray,Auto coming home headlights.
Location: Glasgow

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by a4gee »

I had P zeros on my last car and they are great but because of their softer compound they did wear fast.

My eagle F1`s on the Roc now are brilliant vs the dunlop maxx which were on it :yes:
User avatar
chrisyboyc
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:54 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Options: Leather,Criuse Control, Dynaudio possible RS6 alloys if i have cash

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by chrisyboyc »

I'm running dunlops at the moment and i'm about to change the fronts as theys've done 28000 miles and the rears 49,000 miles
If you see S9 CTC driving around give us a wave I do 40,000 miles a year it gets lonely out there
ZephyR
Posts: 914
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:59 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: 18" Inters, Front fogs, Multi-function steering wheel, Parking sensors & Interior mats
Location: Manchester

Re: EVO magazine 2012 tyre test

Post by ZephyR »

Cuprabob wrote: I'm still on my original front P Zeros after 31k miles. Still a few thousand left in them. That's the longest I've ever managed out of a set of front tyres. Normally I get around 20k miles. I'm currently doing around 2.5k miles a month, mainly motorway driving.
Same with me. Got 21k on the clock and had to change one of the original P Zeros on the front for my MOT. Not cause it was worn - still had several thousand miles on the tread - but because it had a bulge from hitting a pot hole which would failed MOT on.
P Zeros have given me great performance in wet and dry and have lasted longer than mist other tyres I've had. A bit pricey but worth it
Post Reply