R-Line
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:49 pm
I wonder if I've missed the point of the R-Line?
When I was at the dealers they said it was "The Image of the R, but with the engine from the GT". Which made sense then, but looking at it sounds like rubbish. As in the main visual things between the GT and R, are the front bumper (seperate DRLS, bigger intake), rear bumper (left right exaust), and inside the gloss black trim and R badges. I mean visually there's not too much different.
But then the R-Line doesn't seem to have any of them. So hardly the "Image" of the R. Don't get me wrong, there's some minor bits, lack of side rub strips, but that's hardly a mirror image.
So to me it looks like a GT, but with a few more of the "options" as standard? Does that seem fair?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's not worth it... just trying to work out if I missed something.
When I was at the dealers they said it was "The Image of the R, but with the engine from the GT". Which made sense then, but looking at it sounds like rubbish. As in the main visual things between the GT and R, are the front bumper (seperate DRLS, bigger intake), rear bumper (left right exaust), and inside the gloss black trim and R badges. I mean visually there's not too much different.
But then the R-Line doesn't seem to have any of them. So hardly the "Image" of the R. Don't get me wrong, there's some minor bits, lack of side rub strips, but that's hardly a mirror image.
So to me it looks like a GT, but with a few more of the "options" as standard? Does that seem fair?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's not worth it... just trying to work out if I missed something.