Page 2 of 2

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:37 pm
by pokeiarda
This may have nothing to do with the remap but I'm looking to het a bigger picture. The remap has been in for 20k miles but I'm replacing the gearbox in my diesel scirocco. The clutch arm or arms got lose and put a hole in the housing.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:58 pm
by Irvysan
pokeiarda wrote:This may have nothing to do with the remap but I'm looking to het a bigger picture. The remap has been in for 20k miles but I'm replacing the gearbox in my diesel scirocco. The clutch arm or arms got lose and put a hole in the housing.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
This exact thing happened to another forum member, I will have to try and find the thread so you can read it.


Sent from my phone

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:08 pm
by pokeiarda
Irvysan wrote:
pokeiarda wrote:This may have nothing to do with the remap but I'm looking to het a bigger picture. The remap has been in for 20k miles but I'm replacing the gearbox in my diesel scirocco. The clutch arm or arms got lose and put a hole in the housing.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
This exact thing happened to another forum member, I will have to try and find the thread so you can read it.


Sent from my phone
That would be very useful.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:08 pm
by pokeiarda
Irvysan wrote:
pokeiarda wrote:This may have nothing to do with the remap but I'm looking to het a bigger picture. The remap has been in for 20k miles but I'm replacing the gearbox in my diesel scirocco. The clutch arm or arms got lose and put a hole in the housing.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
This exact thing happened to another forum member, I will have to try and find the thread so you can read it.


Sent from my phone
That would be very useful.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:13 pm
by Irvysan
Here you go : http://www.sciroccocentral.co.uk/forum/ ... hp?t=19938" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sent from my phone

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:23 pm
by Mr OCD
Thoughts on remapping 170 CR engine by Celtic? Quoted £270

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:23 pm
by pokeiarda
Cheers for that. i have it saved. going to see if i can use it as leverage

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 10:13 pm
by sciroccorich
Anyone have any experience with a company called Vagtech in Milton Keynes?

They claim that their Revo stage 1 map (complete with Forge recirculation valve and Revo panel filter) would increase BHP from 200 to 280. That is with everything else stock and with no problems as a result.

When asked about having a standard clutch, they said that like any clutch, it could last 5 mins or 5 years, it depends on your driving style.

Any thoughts on this and them?

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 8:08 am
by DAN180Y
sciroccorich wrote:Anyone have any experience with a company called Vagtech in Milton Keynes?

They claim that their Revo stage 1 map (complete with Forge recirculation valve and Revo panel filter) would increase BHP from 200 to 280. That is with everything else stock and with no problems as a result.

When asked about having a standard clutch, they said that like any clutch, it could last 5 mins or 5 years, it depends on your driving style.

Any thoughts on this and them?
that sounds very exagerated to me, a stage 1 should take you to around the 250 mark and a stage 2 would go around 280 roughly, get them to guarantee the 280 in writing then go for it

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:57 am
by sciroccorich
DAN180Y wrote:
sciroccorich wrote:Anyone have any experience with a company called Vagtech in Milton Keynes?

They claim that their Revo stage 1 map (complete with Forge recirculation valve and Revo panel filter) would increase BHP from 200 to 280. That is with everything else stock and with no problems as a result.

When asked about having a standard clutch, they said that like any clutch, it could last 5 mins or 5 years, it depends on your driving style.

Any thoughts on this and them?
that sounds very exagerated to me, a stage 1 should take you to around the 250 mark and a stage 2 would go around 280 roughly, get them to guarantee the 280 in writing then go for it

Yeah that's what I thought......To be honest i'm not sure whether I want more than 250BHP anyway when everything else (fuel pump, intercooler etc) is stock, I don't want to risk the problems associated with it. I just want a bit more grunt but not go mad!

I've was always told by friends that anything more than 250 BHP on a front wheel drive (in oppose to a rear wheel drive) hot hatch is a waste of time anyway because you just get too much torque steer!...........I'm sure others on here will disagree and that comment will cause a whole new debate :shake:

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:56 pm
by Irvysan
I would agree with this rich although poly mounts and bushes with an anti lift kit will sort most of that out.

Sent from my phone

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 8:09 am
by SciroccoEire
Im currently at 264bhp and around 300lb/ft with absolutely no torque steer.

Car drives great!

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:04 pm
by sciroccorich
SciroccoEire wrote:Im currently at 264bhp and around 300lb/ft with absolutely no torque steer.

Car drives great!

Good to know sciroccoEire, is that with everything else stock?

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:41 pm
by SciroccoEire
@sciroccorich , Yea , Engine wise that is stock!

I cant stress the difference in power and power delivery between stock Vs the remap. I love it.
I am kicking myself not getting it done sooner. Had the car 4 years , it was great at the start but after you get used to the stock power it can be kind of underwhelming :shrug: .

Addicted to the turbo sounds now which are much more noticable since the boost has been upped. And now that i have a Milltek on i drive everywhere with the windows down... :cry: :cry:

Re: Which remap?

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:58 pm
by DAN180Y
SciroccoEire wrote:@sciroccorich , Yea , Engine wise that is stock!

I cant stress the difference in power and power delivery between stock Vs the remap. I love it.
I am kicking myself not getting it done sooner. Had the car 4 years , it was great at the start but after you get used to the stock power it can be kind of underwhelming :shrug: .

Addicted to the turbo sounds now which are much more noticable since the boost has been upped. And now that i have a Milltek on i drive everywhere with the windows down... :cry: :cry:
totally agree with what you said about remaps i had my 2nd car remapped and when i got this (3rd car 2.0 tsi rocc) even though it was a more powerful engine i could tell it was being held back and not as responsive, got the remap done in the 2nd week of having it, once youve had a remapped car you cant go standard :nod: